From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2004-01-22 14:13:22
|
You could just take the plunge and have your next version be 1.0.0. Then go 1.1.0 etc from there on. The 3-digit approach is correct because it signifies major-minor-patch releases. Don. On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:48:59PM -0600, Meiste, Gregory wrote: > Hi all! >=20 >=20 > I've been working on an update to my mailing lists module. The > current version is 0.3.3 - however, it is currently being reported to > boost to be 0.33 >=20 >=20 > I have been using numbers with only one decimal in the version number > since 0.10 because I didn't realize that "0.1.0" (with quotes) would > be accepted by boost. Now, everyone is using the two decimal approach > but me. I believe the two decimal approach is a "more correct" way to > report versions and would like to switch to it. >=20 >=20 > My question is this: When I update to 0.4.0, can I report "0.4.0" to > boost and all will update well? I don't want to cause problems with > people's sites can I'm being anal about a version number. If it is > too risky I'll just stick to 0.40. However, I wouldn't think it would > cause any problems, but I'm throwing it out to you guys for your > opinion. >=20 >=20 > What do you think? Thanks in advance! >=20 >=20 > Greg >=20 > "blindman1314" --=20 "When I'm the president, we're not going to obfuscate when it comes to fore= ign policy." George W. Bush January 7, 2000 Republican Debate in New Hampshire. |