From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-06-24 13:30:34
|
D'oh yeah you're right. Perhaps I should have tested with more than just two items. Works like a champ! Don. On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Steven Levin wrote: > Don, > > The Manager currently builds sorts into the SQL statement it generates. > So you should only provide the sort links for values that have columns > in > the database. Because the sort is in the SQL statement it will be sorting > on the int in the database not the translated string. I think this is how > it should work and you should end up with the same results. > > Steven > > > According to my brief tests when I use the new Item/Manager functionality > > to change a value, then the sorting is done on the changed value, not the > > original. > > > > Meaing if I had a unix timestamp int that I wanted to sort, but was having > > a getxxx() function interpret it as "Jul 28, 1976", that string is what > > gets sorted not the int value, which is what SHOULD be sorted. > > > > Am I right? > > > > Don. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. > > Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! > > INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > > _______________________________________________ > > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > > Php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > > > > > |