From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2003-06-24 02:59:10
|
According to my brief tests when I use the new Item/Manager functionality to change a value, then the sorting is done on the changed value, not the original. Meaing if I had a unix timestamp int that I wanted to sort, but was having a getxxx() function interpret it as "Jul 28, 1976", that string is what gets sorted not the int value, which is what SHOULD be sorted. Am I right? Don. |