From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2002-10-22 19:03:26
|
Thanks. Perhaps the phpWS team wants to do some updated benchmarking tests if they have the time. ;) Sorry if I sounded caustic before. It just appeared to me that you were throwing around statements without any backing, troll-style. Thanks again, Don. On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Eloi George wrote: > > I guess what you "think" doesn't count for much. > > <chuckle> You're right, it doesn't. When I say "I think", what I'm actually > saying is that I'm making a totally unqualified guess and I'm hoping that > someone else who knows the answer would step up. Incidentally, I just found > a post at http://www.phpbuilder.net/annotate/message.php3?id=1002047 which > said that 200 queries/sec is doable. So I was wrong on that assumption. > > >I would require valid > > numbers. I'll assume you are using mysql with postnuke. Have you tested > > with postgres or mssql or oracle or anything else? It doesn't sound like > > it. > > I guess I forgot to mention that that is -not- my site. It was a heavy-use > site mentioned in a post on postnuke.com back in August. I have no idea > what the db backend is. For all I know the stats page could have been made > up to sell advertising. That's why I used it as a -representation- of what > we hope to acheive with our own sites. > > There is a benchmarking suite available on the PEAR site. An old benchmark > summary found on http://www.phplens.com/lens/adodb/ indicated a 152-176% > overhead. Of course results will vary on different configurations & > versions. <grin> > > -Eloi- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > |