From: Don S. <do...@se...> - 2002-10-21 14:55:13
|
Probably not. I wasn't aware that PEAR changed the name behind the scenes. So just using $table_name in the php code should work great. Thanks for the heads-up. Don. On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Matthew McNaney wrote: > > > I'm wondering if using the table_name as the sequence name will work on > > all db systems. I don't know explicitly if it won't work, but could > > there be a possibility of naming collisions? > > > > Perhaps using "seq_$table_name" would suit? > > I just noticed that PEAR saves the sequence tables as > sequenceName_seq > > So prefixing creates: > > seq_sequenceName_seq > > > Do we still want the prefix? > > Matt > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpwebsite-developers mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwebsite-developers > |