From: Karsten D. <k.d...@fi...> - 2002-03-22 11:18:25
|
On Don, Mär 21, 2002 at 06:21:20 -0500, Randall Hansen Wood wrote: > Regarding the new language constructs: [...] > I can think of a couple of reasons to store the translations in the > database: > 1) files full of code do not have to be maintained. > 2) translations can be updated off the web without having to download, FTP > and install a file. > 3) translations do not have to sync with the English updates. Code can be > updated, patched, whatnot and translations can come later, if need be... 4) We use the database for every page call anyway. So the impact wouldn't be that bad. If you combine with the mentioned cacheing, this would be cool. Just my 2 cents, Karsten -- fishfarm netsolutions - Karsten Dambekalns Echternstraße 73 - 38100 Braunschweig Tel. +49 531 1232902 k.d...@fi... Fax. +49 531 1232906 http://www.fishfarm.de/ ----------------------------------------------------- |