RE: [Phpwebsite-developers] Additional Standards

[Alain F. <al...@va...>]

Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Additional StandardsHello,


I absolutely agree. Sorry for the shortness of the mail, but there's nothing
more to add :)
  -----Message d'origine-----
  De : php...@li...
[mailto:php...@li...]De la part de
Aaron Adams
  Envoyé : mardi 24 avril 2001 15:08
  À : php...@li...
  Objet : Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Additional Standards


  In my experience, using a semantic naming convention works best for CSS
.class names (that is, your descriptors should denote functionality).
Example:

  .smaller = INCORRECT
  .copyright = CORRECT

  .big5 = INCORRECT
  .subtitle = CORRECT

  Not only is it easier for someone to understand a site's style at a
glance, but a semantic naming convention will help identify content for
future XML applications. Thoughts?
  ---
  Aaron Adams



    From: Karsten Dambekalns <k.d...@tu...>
    Organization: fishfarm
    Reply-To: php...@li...
    Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:08:41 +0200
    To: php...@li...
    Subject: Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Additional Standards




    On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:49:50PM -0400, Todd Owen wrote:

    > Does anyone have a comprehensive set of CSS descriptors we should use?
    > ex. .big, .red, .bigred, .path, .smallnav, etc.
    > ezPublish has a good start.  Should we use theirs?
    > This will be a standard for the core and module programmers.

    We (that is Frits Jensen, W.D. Sumilang and Karsten Dambekalns) are in
    the process of developing a suggestion for this topic. If you all
    could be patient a few more days, we will likely have something to
    submit here...

    Regards,
    Karsten
    --
    Why do we have to hide from the police, daddy?
    Because we use emacs, son. They use vi.
    -----------------------------
    mailto:k.d...@tu... w³: http://www.k-fish.de/
    gpg: http://www.k-fish.de/mykeys.gpg