Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Additional Standards

[Aaron A. <aa...@wc...>]

In my experience, using a semantic naming convention works best for CSS
.class names (that is, your descriptors should denote functionality).
Example:=20

.smaller =3D INCORRECT
.copyright =3D CORRECT

.big5 =3D INCORRECT
.subtitle =3D CORRECT

Not only is it easier for someone to understand a site's style at a glance,
but a semantic naming convention will help identify content for future XML
applications. Thoughts?
---
Aaron Adams


From: Karsten Dambekalns <k.d...@tu...>
Organization: fishfarm
Reply-To: php...@li...
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:08:41 +0200
To: php...@li...
Subject: Re: [Phpwebsite-developers] Additional Standards


On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:49:50PM -0400, Todd Owen wrote:

> Does anyone have a comprehensive set of CSS descriptors we should use?
> ex. .big, .red, .bigred, .path, .smallnav, etc.
> ezPublish has a good start.  Should we use theirs?
> This will be a standard for the core and module programmers.

We (that is Frits Jensen, W.D. Sumilang and Karsten Dambekalns) are in
the process of developing a suggestion for this topic. If you all
could be patient a few more days, we will likely have something to
submit here...

Regards,
Karsten
--=20
Why do we have to hide from the police, daddy?
Because we use emacs, son. They use vi.
-----------------------------
mailto:k.d...@tu... w=B3: http://www.k-fish.de/
gpg: http://www.k-fish.de/mykeys.gpg