|
From: clayton c. <cc...@ca...> - 2001-03-27 20:52:54
|
one thing to consider is that there is a move underway to port Pear::DB to C. how long this will take is uncertain, though. right now though, its isnt quite as mature as PHPLib, but its growing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "W.D.Sumilang" <wa...@on...> To: <php...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, 27. March 2001 15:39 Subject: [Phpwebsite-developers] PHPlib > i'm leaning towards > phplib which i've worked with. it includes perm priviledges, db abstraction, > sessions mgmt, etc. etc. seems like maintenenance wouldn't be much if > the only thing in the phpWS code is the phplib class instances. But > i think this (or native sess, or ADODB sessions, etc.) might conflict > with the current way phpWS is architected for page output (eg. header->header,theme,footer->footer, > and module includes) which is obviously under scrutiny with all the > theme > discussions. |