From: Mike N. <mh...@us...> - 2004-07-01 17:40:17
|
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 14:21, Eloi George wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > >So far my efforts have been poor to say the least. Sorry. > > > I believe in 'ya, Mike! Eloi, Thanks for the vote of confidence. :-) > phpws-comm is a needed resource. It's only going to happen if we all > participate. Agreed. > However, I think that SF is not the place to host it. SF's structure > & policies are based on hosting various development teams in a central > repository. phpws-comm's (correct me if I'm wrong) purpose is to do > the same thing limited to a certain theme (phpWebsite). Essentially > we're hosting SF *on* SF! Actually, it is possible to host a project like ours on SF, it just requires additional administrative work. Example: fink, leaf, etc. > Mike, have you given any thought to hosting phpws-comm on the Appstate > servers or on phpwebsitemanual? We'd lose tracker functionality, but > except for forum-based moderators I think that phpwsbb make a wonderful > substitution. It is a possibility, but my usefulness would cease. My only redeeming values are related to my knowledge of the SF services, structure, and staff. Possible alternatives: savannah.gnu.org, gforge.org, www.egroupware.org Note: hosting becomes an issue with gforge and egroupware. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs |