Re: [-comm-devel] Re: Please assign open problems to me

[Tony M. <cl...@us...>]

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Eloi George wrote:

> Mike Noyes wrote:
> 
> >So far my efforts have been poor to say the least. Sorry.
> >
> I believe in 'ya, Mike!
> 
> Tony.  Although I'm not one to talk because I release my module on both 
> SF and my own site, I do have to say that Mike *is* trying his level 
> best to administrate phpws-comm while having to deal with his real job & 
> that wicked cool scar he's sportin' now.

That's cool.  And I don't mean to criticize (yeah, I do :)), but I thought 
that what I had asked wasn't unreasonable (it's a switch that's flipped, 
auto-assigning issues to the guy who wrote the module).  There seems to be 
a level of complication and administration that I don't really believe is 
necessary.

This is just my opinion, and I'm assuming this list is where we can voice 
our opinions.

> phpws-comm is a needed resource.  It's only going to happen if we all 
> participate.  However, I think that SF is not the place to host it.  
> SF's structure & policies are based on hosting various development teams 
> in a central repository.  phpws-comm's (correct me if I'm wrong) purpose 
> is to do the same thing limited to a certain theme (phpWebsite).  
> Essentially we're hosting SF *on* SF! 

Why IS phpwebsite on SorceForge?  It seems that the CVS tree is being 
hosted elsewhere.

> Mike, have you given any thought to hosting phpws-comm on the Appstate 
> servers or on phpwebsitemanual?  We'd lose tracker functionality, but 
> except for forum-based moderators I think that phpwsbb make a wonderful 
> substitution.

I would really miss the tracker.  It's one of the main reasons I joined 
the project on SF.

-- 
Hometown Enterprises Internet Services
Professional, affordable web design and hosting.
http://www.hteis.com/