From: Firman W. <fi...@gm...> - 2005-09-29 06:07:25
|
On 9/29/05, Yves Glodt <yg...@mi...> wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2005 06:44, Firman Wandayandi wrote: > > On 9/28/05, Yves Glodt <yg...@mi...> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 21 September 2005 16:41, Felipe Lopes wrote: > > > > Hi there Firman! > > > > we cannot disconsider php4's users...There are much more ppl on > > > > php4 yet if compared to php5. > > > > > > yes and even with php51 next to the door I guess we will see many > > > php4 installs for the next 1 or 2 years... We must stay > > > php4-compatible. Of course, we can have 2 db-layers, but then, php5 > > > also has the sqlite extension and I don't really see a benefit of > > > using pdo right now. I think the sqlite extension has more > > > functions than pdo-sqlite. > > > > Yep, that's true about benefit. Also you right Yves about sqlite > > function has more than pdo, caused I dunno how to create the > > aggregate functions using pdo. Where is it? gone? > > I don't know, but I guess, due to the db-unspecificness of pdo, we will > never see functions that are dbms-specific (e.g. ibase_gen_id() from > firebird) in pdo... > Absolutely, that's what I meant. PDO is easy, simple and maybe faster, also built-in in PHP5, but it's poor with specifics database functions. -- Firman Wandayandi Never Dreamt Before (http://php.hm/~firman/) |