From: Felipe L. <ff...@gm...> - 2005-08-25 18:15:40
|
IMHO we should focus on SQLite2 until php5 upgrades its sqlite extension to SQLite3 officially. In fact, I=B4m not too sure how we should deal w/ this issue, but I imagine that php devel team have good reasons to remain on SQLite2. I would like to hear some words from Yves too... Felipe Lopes On 8/25/05, Firman Wandayandi <fi...@gm...> wrote: > Last night I read about pdo_sqlite extension, it's support SQLite3. I > wondering why the SQLite extension is very slow to upgrade the engine > into version 3. And this morning I asked to SQLite mailing-list about > SQLite3 backward compatibility, then I got SQLite3 isn't support > SQLite2 databases. >=20 > Now, the problem is, If we want phpsla support SQLite3 too, we need > use pdo_sqlite extension for it, but then when we support both of > SQLite2 and SQLite3 we use 2 extensions with very different behaviour. >=20 > My solution is create the pdo2sqlite or sqlite2pdo wrapper, so we just > only need to call the same function for same operations. What do you > think guys? And does anyone has create the sqlite2pdo or pdo2sqlite? >=20 > Other problem is, how to know a database is SQLite2 or SQLite3 format? >=20 > Regards, > -- > Firman Wandayandi > Never Dreamt Before (http://php.hm/~firman/) >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic= es > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q= A > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpsqliteadmin-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpsqliteadmin-devel > |