Re: [Phpsqliteadmin-devel] Be a developer?

[wiseguy <wi...@ig...>]

>On Apr 4, 2005 11:25 AM, wiseguy wrote: 
>> >On Apr 1, 2005 2:24 AM, Yves Glodt wrote: 
>> >> On Thursday 31 March 2005 18:33, Firman Wandayandi wrote: 
>> >> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:46:50 +0200, Yves Glodt wrote: 
>> >> > > On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:12, Firman Wandayandi wrote: 
>> >> > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:24:57 -0300, wiseguy 
>> >> wrote: 
>> >> > > > > At first look Umbrello seems quite wierd to me. I would rather 
>> >> > > > > do it by hand. Besides, I think we will make the class and 
>> >> > > > > forget it exists, after all, thats what OO is made for. The 
>> >> > > > > time we could lose learning how Umbrella works doesnt worth it 
>> >> > > > > IMO, although it seems to be a nice tool to have control over 
>> >> > > > > the OO. 
>> >> > > > > 
>> >> > > > > Well....Dunno...its up to you guys. 
>> >> > > > > 
>> >> > > > > Felipe Lopes 
>> >> > > > 
>> >> > > > I never use Umbrello, I currenttly use Ms Vision nor Rational 
>> >> > > > Rose for drawing the UML. However we doesn't need to draw it, if 
>> >> > > > we just use one class, means there are no association, 
>> >> > > > aggregation, dependency etc. 
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > You are right (and disscovered me as UML newbie ;-) Felipe showed 
>> >> > > me your class yesterday and it looks pretty impressive. 
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > What is you opinion about using it for phpsla? 
>> >> > 
>> >> > That's great! IMHO It would be better if my class merge with 
Felipe's 
>> >> > class and add some methods, 
>> >> 
>> >> Yes that sounds good, :-) maybe u can check with Felipe what has to be 
>> >> done, and if you give me your sourceforge id I add you as developer, 
so 
>> >> if the transition to the new FirmanFelipe class is done you could 
>> >> commit it to cvs 
>> >> 
>> > 
>> >OK, my sourceforge id = firmanw 
>> > 
>> >> > I think that I has missed something :-S, 
>> >> > what do you think? any ideas? 
>> >> 
>> >> I must admit that this and the next week I have not much time for 
>> >> working on phpsla as I have to deliver another project at work :-( 
>> >> I'll be following this list of course, but you and Felipe and Steve 
can 
>> >> let flow all your ideas into cvs :-) It would just be nice if cvs 
would 
>> >> stay in a working state :-) 
>> > 
>> >Nevermind, job well Yves. Me, Felipe and Steve will share the ideas 
>> >and working together, however you can always check out what was 
>> >happened from the list and cvs and we will waiting for you if we found 
>> >some significant problems :-), right guys? 
>> 
>> Yves is busy with i-man, I want to spend all of my php time w/ my website 
>> and Steve seems very busy at his job too. Maybe on the next weeks you 
will 
>> be on your own Firman :-( . I'll try to spend some time on phpsla on this 
>> week yet...Lets see... 
>> 
> 
>OK, actually I has another idea, that phpsla use more than one 
>classes, I currently not finished drawing the UML yet, maybe some 
>abstract explanation will be make it better. The idea is, to create 
>some classes named: phpSLA, phpSLA_Error, phpSLA_Database, 
>phpSLA_Table, phpSLA_Index, phpSLA_Trigger, phpSLA_View, 
>phpSLA_Function, phpSLA_Result, phpSLA_Importer and phpSLA_Dumper, 
>sorry if I missing some classes, the paper isn't here now. Those 
>classes provide usefull methods, e.g phpSLA_Database::connect(), 
>phpSLA_Database::schema(), phpSLA_Table::structure, 
>phpSLA_Table::schema() an so on. So hold on for working the class, I 
>think this will be better than it :-). Dunno that I'm will be busy or 
>not this week, but I tried to finishing the UML first, and show out. 
> 
>Comments? Suggestions? Any better ideas? 

I like the idea! Since we wont have to load a lot of methods that wont be 
used on every situation. 

> 
>Regards, 
>-- 
>Firman Wandayandi .:: OrangEnigmA : Never Dreamt Before ::. 
>