From: wiseguy <wi...@ig...> - 2005-04-04 04:09:37
|
>On Thursday 31 March 2005 20:14, wiseguy wrote: >> >On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:46:50 +0200, Yves Glodt wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:12, Firman Wandayandi wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:24:57 -0300, wiseguy wrote: >> >> > > At first look Umbrello seems quite wierd to me. I would rather >> >> > > do it by hand. Besides, I think we will make the class and >> >> > > forget it exists, after all, thats what OO is made for. The >> >> > > time we could lose learning how Umbrella works doesnt worth it >> >> > > IMO, although it seems to be a nice tool to have control over >> >> > > the OO. >> >> > > >> >> > > Well....Dunno...its up to you guys. >> >> > > >> >> > > Felipe Lopes >> >> > >> >> > I never use Umbrello, I currenttly use Ms Vision nor Rational >> >> > Rose for drawing the UML. However we doesn't need to draw it, if >> >> > we just use one class, means there are no association, >> >> > aggregation, dependency etc. >> >> >> >> You are right (and disscovered me as UML newbie ;-) Felipe showed >> >> me your class yesterday and it looks pretty impressive. >> >> >> >> What is you opinion about using it for phpsla? >> > >> >That's great! IMHO It would be better if my class merge with >> > Felipe's class and add some methods, I think that I has missed >> > something :-S, what do you think? any ideas? >> >> All we have to add to your class is some pagination methods I think. > >IMHO we should separate database and user-interface stuff. Pagination >functions IMHO are to be put into a general include file. Makes sence Yves! > >> Are you current using your class on any site? >> >> To be honest, I'd rather rewrite the class to make it easier to read >> and understand then just add new methods to the 'frankstein' :-D >> >> Felipe |