From: Yves G. <yg...@mi...> - 2005-04-01 22:07:24
|
On Thursday 31 March 2005 20:14, wiseguy wrote: > >On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:46:50 +0200, Yves Glodt wrote: > >> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:12, Firman Wandayandi wrote: > >> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:24:57 -0300, wiseguy wrote: > >> > > At first look Umbrello seems quite wierd to me. I would rather > >> > > do it by hand. Besides, I think we will make the class and > >> > > forget it exists, after all, thats what OO is made for. The > >> > > time we could lose learning how Umbrella works doesnt worth it > >> > > IMO, although it seems to be a nice tool to have control over > >> > > the OO. > >> > > > >> > > Well....Dunno...its up to you guys. > >> > > > >> > > Felipe Lopes > >> > > >> > I never use Umbrello, I currenttly use Ms Vision nor Rational > >> > Rose for drawing the UML. However we doesn't need to draw it, if > >> > we just use one class, means there are no association, > >> > aggregation, dependency etc. > >> > >> You are right (and disscovered me as UML newbie ;-) Felipe showed > >> me your class yesterday and it looks pretty impressive. > >> > >> What is you opinion about using it for phpsla? > > > >That's great! IMHO It would be better if my class merge with > > Felipe's class and add some methods, I think that I has missed > > something :-S, what do you think? any ideas? > > All we have to add to your class is some pagination methods I think. IMHO we should separate database and user-interface stuff. Pagination functions IMHO are to be put into a general include file. > Are you current using your class on any site? > > To be honest, I'd rather rewrite the class to make it easier to read > and understand then just add new methods to the 'frankstein' :-D > > Felipe -- Linux 2.6.11.5 #1 Sat Mar 19 23:20:00 CET 2005 i686 00:06:08 up 15 min, 1 user, load average: 0.28, 0.66, 0.68 |