From: Yves G. <yg...@mi...> - 2005-03-31 19:24:30
|
On Thursday 31 March 2005 18:33, Firman Wandayandi wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:46:50 +0200, Yves Glodt <yg...@mi...> wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:12, Firman Wandayandi wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:24:57 -0300, wiseguy <wi...@ig...> wrote: > > > > At first look Umbrello seems quite wierd to me. I would rather > > > > do it by hand. Besides, I think we will make the class and > > > > forget it exists, after all, thats what OO is made for. The > > > > time we could lose learning how Umbrella works doesnt worth it > > > > IMO, although it seems to be a nice tool to have control over > > > > the OO. > > > > > > > > Well....Dunno...its up to you guys. > > > > > > > > Felipe Lopes > > > > > > I never use Umbrello, I currenttly use Ms Vision nor Rational > > > Rose for drawing the UML. However we doesn't need to draw it, if > > > we just use one class, means there are no association, > > > aggregation, dependency etc. > > > > You are right (and disscovered me as UML newbie ;-) Felipe showed > > me your class yesterday and it looks pretty impressive. > > > > What is you opinion about using it for phpsla? > > That's great! IMHO It would be better if my class merge with Felipe's > class and add some methods, Yes that sounds good, :-) maybe u can check with Felipe what has to be done, and if you give me your sourceforge id I add you as developer, so if the transition to the new FirmanFelipe class is done you could commit it to cvs > I think that I has missed something :-S, > what do you think? any ideas? I must admit that this and the next week I have not much time for working on phpsla as I have to deliver another project at work :-( I'll be following this list of course, but you and Felipe and Steve can let flow all your ideas into cvs :-) It would just be nice if cvs would stay in a working state :-) Regards, Yves -- Linux 2.6.11.5 #1 Sat Mar 19 23:20:00 CET 2005 i686 21:18:18 up 1:37, 1 user, load average: 0.98, 0.62, 0.44 |