From: wiseguy <wi...@ig...> - 2005-03-31 18:15:07
|
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:46:50 +0200, Yves Glodt wrote: >> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 12:12, Firman Wandayandi wrote: >> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:24:57 -0300, wiseguy wrote: >> > > At first look Umbrello seems quite wierd to me. I would rather do >> > > it by hand. Besides, I think we will make the class and forget it >> > > exists, after all, thats what OO is made for. The time we could >> > > lose learning how Umbrella works doesnt worth it IMO, although it >> > > seems to be a nice tool to have control over the OO. >> > > >> > > Well....Dunno...its up to you guys. >> > > >> > > Felipe Lopes >> > >> > I never use Umbrello, I currenttly use Ms Vision nor Rational Rose >> > for drawing the UML. However we doesn't need to draw it, if we just >> > use one class, means there are no association, aggregation, >> > dependency etc. >> >> You are right (and disscovered me as UML newbie ;-) Felipe showed me >> your class yesterday and it looks pretty impressive. >> >> What is you opinion about using it for phpsla? >> > >That's great! IMHO It would be better if my class merge with Felipe's >class and add some methods, I think that I has missed something :-S, >what do you think? any ideas? All we have to add to your class is some pagination methods I think. Are you current using your class on any site? To be honest, I'd rather rewrite the class to make it easier to read and understand then just add new methods to the 'frankstein' :-D Felipe |