From: Yves G. <yg...@mi...> - 2005-03-29 18:26:57
|
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 00:12, Firman Wandayandi wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:04:35 +0200, Yves Glodt <yg...@mi...> wrote: > > On Monday 28 March 2005 23:27, Firman Wandayandi wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:00:58 +0200, Yves Glodt <yg...@mi...> wrote: > > > > some if our code is OO, some is less... We use the SPSQLite > > > > class from Alan, but it is not maintained anymore since some > > > > time. Maybe we should use something else, maybe PEAR. What do > > > > you think about that? > > > > > > Sure, why not. Which packages wil be use? Just DB only? or more? > > > > For the start I was thinking about DB only, but there could be > > other uses as well. > > > > Question... would we ship a copy of PEAR in code code (for the case > > that any users/hosters don't have PEAR installed? IMHO it would be > > preferable to include it for convenience reasons. > > IMHO too, but I has class that adopted on SPSQLite and > PEAR::DB::SQLite to fit our needed, maybe it usefull for phpsla. Maybe you can post a link to that class so we can take a look at it... It sounds promising for sure! > BTW > I love to use PEAR::DB. -- Linux 2.6.11.5 #1 Sat Mar 19 23:20:00 CET 2005 i686 20:26:05 up 1:16, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.20, 0.24 |