From: Dan W. <kil...@us...> - 2002-04-09 20:42:56
|
Francisco, I may have mis-understood what you were requesting. Were you wanting to simply read documentation on the new version, or did you want developer access to the cvs? If it's the documentation, we can't help you... there isn't much information regaurding the new version other than some emails intersperced in the -devel mailing list. If you want developer access to the cvs, then I would hope that all projects require some type of evidence that you are a capable developer before allowing access into the cvs. This is a completely normal and sane requirement prior to allowing developer access. I don't think I've ever been part of an open- source project where some type of contribution to the product was the key to being granted access into the code. If you have something to contribute to the project or have a list of other projects in which you have been involved, then we would be happy to have you aboard. But until we know that, there is no real point. -Dan Quoting Francisco Reyes <li...@na...>: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Dan Wilson wrote: > > > Nope... it's not being developed by just one individual... If you want > to > > help, we really need some kind of evidence that you will benefit the > team. > This is a very strange way to "invite" people to join your project. > Given your "selectivity" I guess I am better off forking the source and > doing my own thing or simply doing a new project from scratch. > > It is your project so you can do whatever you want with it, however I find > it very strange that you would not let people subscribe/read only to your > development list and that you would ask for people to prove their "worth" > before letting them give you any input. > > Wish you best of luck with your project. I already saw enough of your > management style to not want to be part of this. > > |