Menu

#1240 (in 2.6.0) Missing edit/delete buttons for lonq sql query

2.6.0-alpha1
fixed
1
2013-06-11
2004-05-11
No

- search a database
- browse results

Buttons "Edit" and "Delete" in front of each found
record are replaced with question marks; tooltip on
both question marks says: "You should define a primary
key for this table", but the records are belonging to a
table with a propperly defined primary key.

WinNT 4 SP6:
- phpMyAdmin 2.6.0-alpha2
- Apache 2.0.44
- PHP 4.3.5
- MySQL 4.0.17

Win98SE:
- Mozilla 1.7 RC1

Bye,
Peter

Discussion

  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=192186

    Doesn't this happen also when browsing that table?

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=573985

    Browsing this particular table = OK;
    Searching only this particular table, results are displayd
    WITH "Edit" & "Delete" Buttons.

     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=192186

    Can you post here structure of this table?

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=573985

    CREATE TABLE address (
    id mediumint(5) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
    titel enum('Familie','Frau','Frau Dipl.Med.','Frau
    Dipl.Psych.','Frau Dr.','Frau oder Herr','Frau oder Herr
    Dr.','Frau und Herr','Herr','Herr Dipl.Ing.','Herr
    Dr.','Herr Dr.Ing.','Herr Dr.jur.','Herr Dr.med.','Herr
    Dr.rer.nat.','Herr Ing.','Herr Mag.','Herr Prof.','Herr
    Prof.Dr.','Herr Prof.Dr.med.','Herr Prof.Mag.','Herr
    SR','Mr.','Mrs.','Sr.') default NULL,
    vnam varchar(48) default NULL,
    nnam varchar(48) default NULL,
    inst varchar(64) default NULL,
    abt varchar(64) default NULL,
    str varchar(64) default NULL,
    land varchar(4) default 'D',
    plz varchar(10) default NULL,
    ort varchar(64) default NULL,
    t_prim varchar(32) default NULL,
    t_sek varchar(32) default NULL,
    t_mob varchar(32) default NULL,
    t_fax varchar(32) default NULL,
    email varchar(64) default NULL,
    anrede varchar(48) default NULL,
    s1 varchar(32) default NULL,
    s2 varchar(32) default NULL,
    lkdnum varchar(32) default NULL,
    ustid varchar(32) default NULL,
    buland
    enum('BB','BE','BW','BY','HB','HE','HH','MV','NS','NW','RP','SA','SH','SL','SN','TH')
    default NULL,
    s4 varchar(32) default NULL,
    s5 varchar(32) default NULL,
    s6 varchar(32) default NULL,
    ent_date date default NULL,
    ent_by enum('as','hc','me','ve','zr','cl','w','uh')
    default NULL,
    mod_date date default NULL,
    mod_by enum('as','hc','me','ve','zr','cl','w','uh')
    default NULL,
    mod_why varchar(200) default NULL,
    remarks varchar(200) default NULL,
    geb date default NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (id),
    KEY titel (titel),
    KEY vnam (vnam),
    KEY nnam (nnam),
    KEY inst (inst),
    KEY str (str),
    KEY plz (plz),
    KEY ort (ort)
    ) TYPE=MyISAM PACK_KEYS=0 COMMENT='Adressen';

     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11
    • assigned_to: nobody --> nijel
    • status: open --> open-accepted
     
  • Garvin Hicking

    Garvin Hicking - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=473563

    This happens always because in a DB-search generated query like:

    SELECT `username` , `password` , `authorid` ,
    `mail_comments` , `mail_trackbacks` , `email` , `userlevel`
    FROM `usrdb_superdbl_site`.`serendipity_authors`
    WHERE `username`
    LIKE '%garvin%' OR `password`
    LIKE '%garvin%' OR `authorid`
    LIKE '%garvin%' OR `mail_comments`
    LIKE '%garvin%' OR `mail_trackbacks`
    LIKE '%garvin%' OR `email`
    LIKE '%garvin%' OR `userlevel`
    LIKE '%garvin%' LIMIT 0 , 30

    The unique query's primary key is the whole WHERE structure
    instead of the real primary key (here: authorid).

    I guess the detection routine for the primary key fails?

     
  • Garvin Hicking

    Garvin Hicking - 2004-05-11
    • assigned_to: nijel --> nobody
    • status: open-accepted --> open
     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11
    • assigned_to: nobody --> nijel
    • status: open --> open-accepted
     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=192186

    garvin: I'm working on this :-). There are two problems:

    - select query is generated too much complicated - no need
    to list fields
    - query for editing is not generated according to primary
    key, but counts also with current where expression

     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11
    • summary: missing edit/delete buttons after full db search --> (in 2.6.0) Missing edit/delete buttons for lonq sql query
    • priority: 5 --> 1
    • status: open-accepted --> open-fixed
     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-11

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=192186

    Hmm, it's not about primary key, but about keeping current
    query in url...

    Version I just commited into CVS will generate simple SELECT
    query for this case, so it should work fine (but you won't
    return back to original query).

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2004-05-27

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=356859

    This bug isn't completely fixed in the actual CSV. Try to
    execute something like this:

    select * from konto where 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1
    and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1
    and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1
    and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1
    and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1

    In the result set, the delete buttons disapear.

    Try to make the query a lot longer. Now both edit and delete
    buttons disapear.

    That's because in common.lib.php when calling
    PMA_linkOrButton() the 4th parameter (allow_button) is
    FALSE. (I do not understand why it is set to FALSE so I'm
    unable to deliver a patch.)

    In any case, the error message shown is completely wrong. It
    says "PRIMARY KEY missing" but there is no check if there is
    really a primary key or not. The check is: if the request
    URI is to long.

     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2004-05-28

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=192186

    There can not be button, because we're inside other form
    (for multi row edit/delete) and html does not allow nested
    forms.

    I decreased limit for truncating query, hope it will be fine
    now for most cases.

     
  • Alexander M. Turek

    • status: open-fixed --> closed-fixed
     
  • Michal Čihař

    Michal Čihař - 2013-06-11
    • Status: closed-fixed --> fixed
     
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.