Re: [Phplib-users] auth url question

[Giancarlo <gia...@na...>]

Il 15:53, gioved=EC 31 ottobre 2002, Matt Williams ha scritto:
> On Thursday 31 October 2002 14:23, Rob Hutton wrote:
> > The more I think about this, the less I agree, because I think that a=
uth
> > logic was/is flawed.  But attached is a version that I think will dro=
p
> > in.
>
> hi all
>
> I've missed most of this thread so forgive me if I've missed something =
or
> am heading off in the wrong direction.
>
> From what I gather a summary of this thread is about using mode=3Dreg o=
r
> something similar in the url to invoke registration, is this correct?
>
> From my point of the view this would be a waste of time. Each applicati=
on
>  that I use phplib on invariably has different requirements for
> registration. For me it is easier to keep registration to it's own page
> where I can control error checking on the form fields, add/remove field=
s as
> I wish without having to worry about anything in phplib that might get
>  broken/compromised in the process.
>

I perfectly agree with this you said.=20
The least we get HTTP_GET/POST_VARS hardcoded in the main start() functio=
n,=20
the better it is for people to extend phplib to their needs.
I myself like to have the possibility, from my proper version of page.inc=
=20
(this means BEFORE invoking auth->start) to invoke separately, depending =
on=20
my needs, any and each of the 3 main function start does:=20
authenticate/login/register

Gian