Re: R: [Phplib-users] PEAR versus phplib
Brought to you by:
nhruby,
richardarcher
From: Maxim D. <max...@bo...> - 2002-09-19 13:43:57
|
Hello Gaetano, Thursday, September 19, 2002, 5:07:30 PM, you wrote: GG> My own wishes: GG> - make it compatible with REGISTER_GLOBALS OFF! Either have 2 API GG> sets or just dump the old code, I don't mind too much as long as it is compatible GG> with new releases of PHP. Yes, that's too easy. We'll have to dump nothing more than all the code based upon PHPLib as well with the API change :) GG> - provide alternatives to the db-access layer, e.g. better integration w. adodb GG> or pear-db etc... Nothing in PHPLib depends on DB_SQL - one can use the db abstraction he likes. The only thing - if CT_SQL is used, just adapt it to the other db API. GG> - provide integration with other php projects that do all the auth-session over again, GG> e.g. phpBB As I know, applications are usually built over the libraries, not vice versa. And if an app uses its own libraries and apis, there's nothing good in adapting other libraries for it - apps will always use the libraries they've initially been based upon. -- Best regards, Maxim Derkachev mailto:max...@bo... IT manager, Symbol-Plus Publishing Ltd. phone: +7 (812) 324-53-53 www.books.ru, www.symbol.ru |