RE: [Phplib-users] phplib vs. pear

[Daniel B. <bo...@io...>]

anyone know what the cause of the slowdown is?
is it all the included files, or just the way the db class is written?

-----Original Message-----
From: Saulius [mailto:sa...@ye...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:59 AM
To: php...@li...
Subject: Re: [Phplib-users] phplib vs. pear


Hello,

> classes had been included but before they were initialised.  If you=20
> alter it to start timing before the classes are included then the
output=20
> is not quite so unfavourable for PEAR.

Yes. Exactly I altered tests and stated timing before any includes. And=20
I was suprised. For example, doing 1 query (after altering tests) took:=20
mysql: 0.03 sec, phplib: 0.06 sec, adodb: 0.14 sec, pear: 0.17 sec.=20
Diference among phplib and pear is enough big: 0.11 sec. So I think,=20
pear is too slow and very unefective. If it would be interesting I could

put results in website.
> See http://www.dybnet.de/MDB/benchmarks.pdf for some more test
results.

My test were taken from that site (http://phplens...).

Bye,
Saulius


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We
supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
ban...@so...
_______________________________________________
Phplib-users mailing list
Php...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phplib-users