RE: [Phplib-users] New phpauth code

[Brian P. <bp...@ct...>]

Relax people. This thread reminds me one of those nature-channel
documentaries where the two dominant males are killing each other in order
to impress a nearby female. In case you didn't know, there are no females
here! And, if there are females here, they could care less which auth class
is better. :)

If phpauth is better, time will tell.

Incidentally, the template class doesn't appear to be logically linked to
phplib in any way. You could, hypothetically, include 'template.inc' and
nothing else.

-bpopp

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Chaney [mailto:mdc...@mi...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Tarique Sani <ta...@sa...>
Cc: 'phplib-users'
Subject: Re: [Phplib-users] New phpauth code


On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:23:12AM +0530, Tarique Sani
<ta...@sa...> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Michael Chaney wrote:
> 
> > I've been promising this for a year, but it's undergone plenty of
> > refinement to make it worthwhile.
> 
> Great!!
>  
> I presume you are not asking it to be integrated with PHPlib 
> 
> Are you?

Indeed, your presumption is right.  For those not using the templating
system in phplib, I believe that I have a better alternative.  Again,
this isn't a slam on phplib, I have a lot more flexibility since I don't
need to be backward compatible.

Michael
-- 
Michael Darrin Chaney
mdc...@mi...
http://www.michaelchaney.com/

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so...
_______________________________________________
Phplib-users mailing list
Php...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phplib-users