Re: [Phplib-users] phplib vs. pear

[Saulius <sa...@ye...>]

Hello,

> classes had been included but before they were initialised.  If you 
> alter it to start timing before the classes are included then the output 
> is not quite so unfavourable for PEAR.

Yes. Exactly I altered tests and stated timing before any includes. And 
I was suprised. For example, doing 1 query (after altering tests) took: 
mysql: 0.03 sec, phplib: 0.06 sec, adodb: 0.14 sec, pear: 0.17 sec. 
Diference among phplib and pear is enough big: 0.11 sec. So I think, 
pear is too slow and very unefective. If it would be interesting I could 
put results in website.
> See http://www.dybnet.de/MDB/benchmarks.pdf for some more test results.

My test were taken from that site (http://phplens...).

Bye,
Saulius