Re: [Phplib-users] What is the 'standard phplib install'?

[darcy w. c. <da...@el...>]

hi there,

  i've gotten into the habit of setting up my own prepend.php script for
each site i host.  i'm using the "php_admin_value auto_prepend_file" and
"php_admin_value include_path".  This may be more difficult for someone
new to setup, but i think saves a lot of hassle down the road.

  Also, i rename the directory which contains all the code to phplib.  i
find the fact that there is a directory with examples called phplib a
little confusing.  Just my 2cents...

Chris Johnson wrote:
> 
> Jesse's remarks on the nose for me.  I think Richard was right that the
> standard local.inc is a bit much.  We probably ought to ship several example
> local.inc files or something.  Ideally, we would get to where Jesse
> suggests: application specific prepend and local.inc files.  That way, a
> phpLIB installation could be shared by multiple applications -- without
> stepping on each other's toes, so to speak.
> 
> ..chris
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jesse Swensen" <ph...@sw...>
> 
> I agree.  Local.inc becomes a problem when you have multiple applications
> you want to segregate the parts.  The auto prepend and the local.inc should
> be application specific or at least have the ability to be application
> specific.
> --
> Jesse
> 
> > From: "nathan r. hruby" <na...@ds...>
> 
> > The current local.inc is a bit loaded, but as all app writers know, we
> > don't care about local.inc becasue we can use our own custom subclasses :)
> > I think that, if anything, local.inc should be killed in favor of site and
> > app specfic config files defining what's needed.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phplib-users mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phplib-users

-- 
~darcy w. christ
Elegant Communications Inc.
416.362.9772 x222 | 416.362.8324 fax