From: William B. <boo...@ro...> - 2002-03-09 03:24:20
|
The one thing I would have like to seen with PHPix, is the ability to use it as a PHPNuke module. Of all the image galleries I have tried, PHPix in my opinion was the best. Sad, really sad, to see it go. And then like,Neale Pickett, was all like: > So then, Doug Curtis <dou...@wo...> is all like: > >> After meeting the dependencies, I think it's a pretty slick >> package. It has all of the features that people have been trying >> to add to phpix2. I think phpix2 is faster at creating the >> thumbnails and image resizes on the fly, but IDS has a command >> line script to automatically create the thumbs. Also, in >> general, I found that phpix2 seemed faster. The web interface >> is also a nice feature. I would hate to see phpix2 die away. > > Well it's already pretty much dead, seeing as how nobody's really > maintaining it anymore. Then again, maybe it's just one of those > rare programs which is finished. > > But in any case, I feel like we at least owe it to visitors to > tell them that there are other options available if they need > some hand-holding, don't you think? > > _______________________________________________ > PHPix2-devel mailing list > PHP...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpix2-devel ____________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this email are not necessarily mine, as I've not yet had my medication today. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ |