From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2004-02-04 22:46:26
|
If you have CVS access, please report back to the list page generation times for the following, along with CPU: month year preferences I'm still working on tighter template code to speed up generation. In any instance, 2.0 should be faster than 1.0. Thanks! For example, my setup - Dual 1.25 G4: month - Page generated in 0.733 seconds. year - Page generated in 1.111 seconds. prefs - Page generated in 0.303 seconds. |
From: Greg W. <gr...@gr...> - 2004-02-04 23:02:06
|
Here are the times I'm seeing: Month: 19.264 Year: 19.838 Preferences: 14.798 The server's a Power Mac G4 Dual 450 running OS X 10.3. Why are these so dramatically different from yours? Perhaps the newest changes aren't in CVS yet? When I reload the pages, I notice lower times -- more like 15 seconds -- I assume because it doesn't have to load the images and whatnot? Greg --- http://www.gregwestin.com/ Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Chad wrote: > If you have CVS access, please report back to the list page generation > times for the following, along with CPU: > > month > year > preferences > > I'm still working on tighter template code to speed up generation. In > any instance, 2.0 should be faster than 1.0. > > Thanks! > > > For example, my setup - > > Dual 1.25 G4: > month - Page generated in 0.733 seconds. > year - Page generated in 1.111 seconds. > prefs - Page generated in 0.303 seconds. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > |
From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2004-02-04 23:27:39
|
Preferences is a good benchmark for ical parsing time. Is this a straight CVS install? Or your calendars? My times are for 'All Cals Combined' with the 3 calendars in CVS. On my powerbook 1Ghz, my times are almost double, with over 2.3 seconds for year. On a Linux-Athlon 1900, Im getting 1.113 seconds for year. There hasn't been anything added to ical_parser.php that would make it faster or slower than in 1.0. -C On Feb 4, 2004, at 3:02 PM, Greg Westin wrote: > Here are the times I'm seeing: > > Month: 19.264 > Year: 19.838 > Preferences: 14.798 > > The server's a Power Mac G4 Dual 450 running OS X 10.3. Why are these > so > dramatically different from yours? Perhaps the newest changes aren't > in > CVS yet? When I reload the pages, I notice lower times -- more like 15 > seconds -- I assume because it doesn't have to load the images and > whatnot? > > Greg > http://www.gregwestin.com/ > Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Chad wrote: > >> If you have CVS access, please report back to the list page generation >> times for the following, along with CPU: >> >> month >> year >> preferences >> >> I'm still working on tighter template code to speed up generation. In >> any instance, 2.0 should be faster than 1.0. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> For example, my setup - >> >> Dual 1.25 G4: >> month - Page generated in 0.733 seconds. >> year - Page generated in 1.111 seconds. >> prefs - Page generated in 0.303 seconds. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >> _______________________________________________ >> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list >> Php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
From: Greg W. <we...@fa...> - 2004-02-05 00:55:15
|
Oh, these were with my calendars. With the calendars in CVS: Month: 4.930 secs Year: 6.730 secs Preferences: 3.196 secs Also, I noticed that the colors of the calendars don't cycle back to the first color if you have more calendars than there are colors. Greg --- http://www.gregwestin.com/ Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Chad wrote: > Preferences is a good benchmark for ical parsing time. Is this a > straight CVS install? Or your calendars? My times are for 'All Cals > Combined' with the 3 calendars in CVS. > > On my powerbook 1Ghz, my times are almost double, with over 2.3 seconds > for year. On a Linux-Athlon 1900, Im getting 1.113 seconds for year. > > There hasn't been anything added to ical_parser.php that would make it > faster or slower than in 1.0. > > -C > > On Feb 4, 2004, at 3:02 PM, Greg Westin wrote: > > > Here are the times I'm seeing: > > > > Month: 19.264 > > Year: 19.838 > > Preferences: 14.798 > > > > The server's a Power Mac G4 Dual 450 running OS X 10.3. Why are these > > so > > dramatically different from yours? Perhaps the newest changes aren't > > in > > CVS yet? When I reload the pages, I notice lower times -- more like 15 > > seconds -- I assume because it doesn't have to load the images and > > whatnot? > > > > Greg > > http://www.gregwestin.com/ > > Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php > > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Chad wrote: > > > >> If you have CVS access, please report back to the list page generation > >> times for the following, along with CPU: > >> > >> month > >> year > >> preferences > >> > >> I'm still working on tighter template code to speed up generation. In > >> any instance, 2.0 should be faster than 1.0. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> For example, my setup - > >> > >> Dual 1.25 G4: > >> month - Page generated in 0.733 seconds. > >> year - Page generated in 1.111 seconds. > >> prefs - Page generated in 0.303 seconds. > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > >> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > >> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > >> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > >> Php...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > _______________________________________________ > > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > > Php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > |
From: <ti...@op...> - 2004-02-08 05:17:00
|
There's my times (with no query string for any of the files) on the versions accessible with anonymous CVS. The machine's processor is: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz MHz: 2400.086 cache size: 512 KB bogomips: 4784.12 Quoting Chad <ch...@ch...>: > If you have CVS access, please report back to the list page generation > times for the following, along with CPU: > > month 0.485 sec > year 0.936 sec > preferences 0.231 sec > > I'm still working on tighter template code to speed up generation. In > any instance, 2.0 should be faster than 1.0. > > Thanks! > > > For example, my setup - > > Dual 1.25 G4: > month - Page generated in 0.733 seconds. > year - Page generated in 1.111 seconds. > prefs - Page generated in 0.303 seconds. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > |