Dear Chad and other VTODO-concerned people,
> It would seem that Low Priority is more important than No Priority and
> should sort No priority to the very bottom.
I think that's a shame, because I wish there were a way for me to indicate
that certain events are unimportant, meaning they should go to the bottom
of the heap, in addition to being able to push events to the top. As it
stands, at least in the iCal implementation, I have to give every to-do a
priority if I want certain ones at the bottom. I suppose this would be
solved if iCal gave every event some sort of medial priority by default,
and let you choose to either raise or lower that, but... alas.
> I haven't gotten it that far yet, not sure when you last checked cvs,
> as there is basic sorting of events. I cheat a bit and give no priority
> events a "10" and completed events and "11" for sanity sorting sake. I
> also havent figured out what to do if there is no due date, for sorting
> sake I was just putting it one year after the start date.
I think you could get around this hack if you used usort(). That way, you
could specify in the comparison function how events without priority,
events without due dates, and completed events should be treated. I think
you're right, though, in putting events with no due dates later than those
with, and events with no priority after those with priority, but before
completed events.
> What would be nice to have (if you want to work on it) is a todo.php
> for the java popup. Since the information is different the popup should
> contain more information such as submitted time, due date, priority,
> and other things found in the spec not supported in iCal.
I'll work on it. I'd noticed that the pop-up was basically useless for
to-dos.
Rock on,
Greg
---
gr...@gr...
http://www.gregwestin.com/
Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php
|
