From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2002-11-24 20:04:44
|
Lately I've been thinking how squished week view is. It might be more useful for those who use it to not have the sidebar on. It certainly could be an option, sidebar on/off. So how useful is the sidebar in week view. Would you miss it? Thoughts? |
From: Jon C. T. <cal...@wa...> - 2002-11-24 23:10:56
|
I'm very pleased with the week view as is. We're using it to schedule series of three-hour classes, so our events have plenty of room to expand vertically. Having the sidebar there makes it all the more useful and descriptive, in my opinion. On the other hand, I could see how someone with more brief events and todos might find the space to be somewhat constraining. I suppose this is another good argument for templates, post-1.0... :) On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 03:04 PM, Chad wrote: > Lately I've been thinking how squished week view is. It might be more > useful for those who use it to not have the sidebar on. It certainly > could be an option, sidebar on/off. So how useful is the sidebar in > week view. Would you miss it? |
From: blaine <la...@us...> - 2002-11-25 02:08:39
|
I think anything that adds flexibility to the display is welcome. I think the template system would (should) go a long way to resolving problems like this; the way I see it, templates need not handle the week/month/year calendar listings per se. More importantly, I think the template system should allow rearrangement of existing "boxes" on the page. For example, one thing that's irked me somewhat is the month view; the one-after-another list of events is at the *bottom* of the page, but it would be more useful for my users if it were at the top. If there were just a template variable for the different page elements, it would be so much easier. For example, you could turn on/off the sidebar on any page, or have it horizontal at the top or bottom of the page, or whatever. Perhaps the template system that's being worked on addresses these issues? In any event, I would definitely miss the sidebar in week view ;-) b. On Sunday, Nov 24, 2002, at 12:04 America/Vancouver, Chad wrote: > Lately I've been thinking how squished week view is. It might be more > useful for those who use it to not have the sidebar on. It certainly > could be an option, sidebar on/off. So how useful is the sidebar in > week view. Would you miss it? > > Thoughts? |
From: Greg W. <gr...@gr...> - 2002-11-25 17:00:48
|
I agree that the week view looks squished, but wouldn't want to get rid of the sidebar, as I use the week view almost exclusively, and want to see my to-do items. I don't think there's anything wrong with adding a customization feature, but maybe we should think of other ways to help un-squish the week view. What about allowing people to choose a screen width? I think it would be relatively simple to replace the appropriate hard-coded widths with calculated widths. On my screen, at least, there's a lot of free space on either side of the calendar, so it could be widened - though I know that many people have smaller screens, so we shouldn't just unilaterally increase the size. On a completely unrelated note, there's no year_on.gif in the red style, and I altered some of the settings for the red stylesheet to make it more distinct from the silver (and, I think, more attractive). I could probably make a year_on image fairly easily, though it might be even easier for whoever made the original. At any rate, how should I go about either offering my changes to the red stylesheet, or submitting it as a new style? Greg --- gr...@gr... http://www.gregwestin.com/ Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Chad wrote: > Lately I've been thinking how squished week view is. It might be more > useful for those who use it to not have the sidebar on. It certainly > could be an option, sidebar on/off. So how useful is the sidebar in > week view. Would you miss it? > > Thoughts? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > |
From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2002-11-25 22:05:05
|
I have been working on updated styles, with 2 new images in silver style, I haven't looked into porting any over to the other styles yet, as I'm not finished with changed. I could be, but Im not sure right now. We usually take care of updating the styles when we update all the translations. Just one of the steps we take before doing a release. I can send you the psd for it if you like. -C On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 09:00 AM, Greg Westin wrote: > On a completely unrelated note, there's no year_on.gif in the red > style, > and I altered some of the settings for the red stylesheet to make it > more > distinct from the silver (and, I think, more attractive). I could > probably make a year_on image fairly easily, though it might be even > easier for whoever made the original. At any rate, how should I go > about > either offering my changes to the red stylesheet, or submitting it as a > new style? > > Greg |