Menu
▾
▴
phpicalendar-devel
|
From: Rob P. <php...@pr...> - 2003-11-14 21:09:17
|
The jump to boxes look messed up to me. I had fixed it in a local version and I thought it was so obvious that I didn't report it. The combo boxes need <br> tags after them. If they look okay in your browser (I am using IE6) I can send you screenshots. Rob |
|
From: Rob P. <php...@pr...> - 2003-11-17 20:41:36
|
I have checked the web interface to CVS on Sourceforge and the files I see jibe with the files I have checked out, not with what was released. Rob At 03:30 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Chad, > >I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the >repository. The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my >patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not. I >guess you have not checked in what you released since many files >differ? Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to date >mirror? For example, CVS shows me the latest version of calendar_nav.php >is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov. The repository is also not tagged with the >0.9.5 release. > >Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a bit >worried. I am curious as to what's up. We have several developers here >with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us are seeing what is in >the 0.9.5 release. If Sourceforge is having problems with mirrors then >people should be aware of that. If it is just that the latest code is not >checked in, then that is cool, we just need to know. > >Rob > >At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >>I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that error. >>Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select >>anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here >>looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS or >>in the released version I just downloaded. >> >>--Chad > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC >GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from >any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! >https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Phpicalendar-devel mailing list >Php...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
|
From: Chad L. <ch...@ch...> - 2003-11-18 00:07:56
|
Sourceforge lately has had ongoing issues with web-based cvs and anonymous cvs. It's my understanding that they are working on these issues and developer access is the only fully working (proper) access. I was under the assumption that all of these issues were fixed, but I really haven't looked anymore into it since access for myself has been 100%. I do tag and export every release, so phpicalendar-0-9-5 should be in there. Anything I marked closed did make it into this release. :-) SourceForge Status: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1 On Nov 17, 2003, at 12:41 PM, Rob Prouse wrote: > I have checked the web interface to CVS on Sourceforge and the files I > see jibe with the files I have checked out, not with what was > released. > > Rob > > At 03:30 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: >> Chad, >> >> I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the >> repository. The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my >> patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not. I >> guess you have not checked in what you released since many files >> differ? Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to >> date mirror? For example, CVS shows me the latest version of >> calendar_nav.php is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov. The repository is >> also not tagged with the 0.9.5 release. >> >> Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a >> bit worried. I am curious as to what's up. We have several >> developers here with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us >> are seeing what is in the 0.9.5 release. If Sourceforge is having >> problems with mirrors then people should be aware of that. If it is >> just that the latest code is not checked in, then that is cool, we >> just need to know. >> >> Rob >> >> At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >>> I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that >>> error. >>> Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select >>> anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here >>> looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS >>> or >>> in the released version I just downloaded. >>> >>> --Chad >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC >> GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from >> any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! >> https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ >> g22lp.tmpl >> _______________________________________________ >> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list >> Php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC > GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from > any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! > https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ > g22lp.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
|
From: Rob P. <php...@pr...> - 2003-11-18 14:48:56
|
That is good to know, although it does make it hard for us to help you test these releases without you posting a release candidate :( It looks like the updates are in CVS this morning. 3 days lag is a bit of a pain. Maybe in the future, we should hold releases until anonymous CVS catches up, then you can have the benefit of those of us on the list giving it a proper going over before the release :) Rob At 04:07 PM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >Sourceforge lately has had ongoing issues with web-based cvs and >anonymous cvs. It's my understanding that they are working on these >issues and developer access is the only fully working (proper) access. >I was under the assumption that all of these issues were fixed, but I >really haven't looked anymore into it since access for myself has been >100%. > >I do tag and export every release, so phpicalendar-0-9-5 should be in >there. Anything I marked closed did make it into this release. :-) |
|
From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2003-11-14 21:20:47
|
Thanks, that bug is already open in sourceforge. If you want, submit a patch for it and I will apply and close it. -C On Nov 14, 2003, at 1:09 PM, Rob Prouse wrote: > The jump to boxes look messed up to me. I had fixed it in a local > version and I thought it was so obvious that I didn't report it. The > combo boxes need <br> tags after them. If they look okay in your > browser (I am using IE6) I can send you screenshots. > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC > GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from > any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! > https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ > g22lp.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
|
From: Rob P. <php...@pr...> - 2003-11-14 22:07:14
|
<html> <body> At 01:20 PM 14/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Thanks, that bug is already open in sourceforge. If you want, submit a <br> patch for it and I will apply and close it.</blockquote><br> The patch is on Sourceforge, #842429. If you prefer, I can send you the changed files directly, but get back to me soon as I am going to be heading home within the hour.<br><br> Rob<br><br> </body> </html> |
|
From: Rob P. <php...@pr...> - 2003-11-17 19:18:59
|
The 0.9.5 release looks pretty bad in IE on Windows because the patch I submitted was not applied. Mozzilla is overly lenient with mis-formed HTML and I assume that whatever browser you are using on the Mac is too. The month page has a double <select> in the resulting HTML which causes it to display all of the options as text. It also does not automatically add a linefeed after select boxes. If you want to see just how bad it looks, you can see it at http://www.alteridem.net/images/selectbug.png The now closed patch #842429 on Sourceforge fixes all of this and has been tested with both Mozzilla and IE on Windows. Rob At 05:07 PM 14/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: >At 01:20 PM 14/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >>Thanks, that bug is already open in sourceforge. If you want, submit a >>patch for it and I will apply and close it. > >The patch is on Sourceforge, #842429. If you prefer, I can send you the >changed files directly, but get back to me soon as I am going to be >heading home within the hour. > >Rob |
|
From: Robert P. <ro...@pr...> - 2003-11-17 19:51:55
|
Another problem with 0.9.5, at the beginning of init.inc.php, the line error_reporting (E_ALL); which is for debugging only, is uncommented. |
|
From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2003-11-20 18:57:44
|
Ok, I'm just getting these emails today? Is sourceforge having issues with mailman as well? It was set as intended for the shipping version (0). -C On Nov 17, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Robert Prouse wrote: > Another problem with 0.9.5, at the beginning of init.inc.php, the line > > error_reporting (E_ALL); > > which is for debugging only, is uncommented. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
|
From: Chad L. <ch...@ch...> - 2003-11-17 19:40:39
|
I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that error. Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS or in the released version I just downloaded. --Chad On Nov 17, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Rob Prouse wrote: > The 0.9.5 release looks pretty bad in IE on Windows because the patch > I submitted was not applied. Mozzilla is overly lenient with > mis-formed HTML and I assume that whatever browser you are using on > the Mac is too. The month page has a double <DEFANGED_select> in the > resulting HTML which causes it to display all of the options as text. > It also does not automatically add a linefeed after select boxes. > > If you want to see just how bad it looks, you can see it at > http://www.alteridem.net/images/selectbug.png > > The now closed patch #842429 on Sourceforge fixes all of this and has > been tested with both Mozzilla and IE on Windows. > > Rob > > At 05:07 PM 14/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: >> At 01:20 PM 14/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >>> Thanks, that bug is already open in sourceforge. If you want, submit >>> a >>> patch for it and I will apply and close it. >> >> The patch is on Sourceforge, #842429. If you prefer, I can send you >> the changed files directly, but get back to me soon as I am going to >> be heading home within the hour. >> >> Rob > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC > GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from > any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! > https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/ > g22lp.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
|
From: Rob P. <php...@pr...> - 2003-11-17 20:30:13
|
Chad, I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the repository. The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not. I guess you have not checked in what you released since many files differ? Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to date mirror? For example, CVS shows me the latest version of calendar_nav.php is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov. The repository is also not tagged with the 0.9.5 release. Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a bit worried. I am curious as to what's up. We have several developers here with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us are seeing what is in the 0.9.5 release. If Sourceforge is having problems with mirrors then people should be aware of that. If it is just that the latest code is not checked in, then that is cool, we just need to know. Rob At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that error. >Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select >anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here >looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS or >in the released version I just downloaded. > >--Chad |
|
From: Robert P. <ro...@pr...> - 2003-11-17 20:36:42
|
I have checked the web interface to CVS on Sourceforge and the files I see jibe with the files I have checked out, not with what was released. Rob At 03:30 PM 17/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: >Chad, > >I did not check release version of PHP iCal, I checked what is in the >repository. The version of calendar_nav.php that you released has my >patches (pretty much), but the version in the repository does not. I >guess you have not checked in what you released since many files >differ? Or maybe anonymous CVS on Sourceforge comes from a not up to date >mirror? For example, CVS shows me the latest version of calendar_nav.php >is 1.13, checked in on 5 Nov. The repository is also not tagged with the >0.9.5 release. > >Sorry if I sounded a bit snappy in the last email, but it had me a bit >worried. I am curious as to what's up. We have several developers here >with anonymous checkouts of the code and none of us are seeing what is in >the 0.9.5 release. If Sourceforge is having problems with mirrors then >people should be aware of that. If it is just that the latest code is not >checked in, then that is cool, we just need to know. > >Rob > >At 11:39 AM 17/11/2003 -0800, you wrote: >>I specifically tested 0.9.5 on WinXP, IE 6 and did not see that error. >>Im also now looking through the code and do not see a double select >>anywhere? BBEdit also does not return any errors. I'm sitting here >>looking in IE, Safari, ect and I still do not see it, either in CVS or >>in the released version I just downloaded. >> >>--Chad > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC >GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from >any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! >https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Phpicalendar-devel mailing list >Php...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X