Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] site using PiC

[Wesley M. <we...@we...>]

PHPiCalendar is under the GPL, so as long as anyone follows that  
license they're good.

I would guess your comment about Google doing a mix of PHPiCalendar  
and Outlook invitations is the obvious choice, as it makes Google  
Calendar compatible with everything. All non-Outlook calendaring  
solutions (including Lotus Notes and Apple Mail/Calendar) use the  
iCalendar spec. In typical Microsoft fashion, Outlook uses its own  
proprietary non-compatible invitation system, IIRC. I think you need  
to link into their MAPI service or something to use it. But I'm not  
very familiar with Outlook's and Exchange's internals so I could be  
mostly wrong about this.

On May 3, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Nicolas Contamin wrote:

> 2006/5/3, Jim Hu <ji...@ta...>:
>> I can't tell about the other one.
>
> In fact it's the same thing, in french.
>
>> [ Your overall philosophy ]
>
> Ok that's fit mine too.
> The french mail you were in CarbonCopy was greetings to iCalConsult
> manager and a request for him to share with us the admin pages he'd
> done.
> As for icalx, it's an old version, but his work could be helpfull in
> my improvement.
>
>> Now that
>> Google is entering the calendar business, it will be interesting to
>> see what happens.
>> It seems that Google calendar provides .ics files, but they don't
>> link cleanly as webcals via phpicalendar.
>
> It seems to me that Google wants to do a mix between PiC and Outlook
> invitation services.
> (I've not yet read the others thread about this subject, so that's all
> I can say about improvement).

--
Wesley Miaw
we...@we...