From: Nicolas C. <nic...@gm...> - 2006-02-01 10:43:17
|
2006/1/31, Jo Rhett <jr...@sv...>: > > > I think Chad is saying is that the main phpicalendar project does not > > support the publish.ical.php or publish.mozilla.php scripts. He says > > > > " we do not take bugs in the pulbish system, including documentation" > > I'm a coder. The "publish system" doesn't really mean anything to me. > The "publish system" could mean the documentation on Sourceforge for > all I know :-( If he had said that publish.ical.php and > publish.mozilla.php > are provided as-is and not supported, then I would have understood. I'm a coder too. And even if I'm not native english speaker, I've understoo= d Chad's sentence. Your words seemed to intend that coders are stupid... That's not a good point for you. > These were provided by others, and while they are important to those > > in the phpicalendar community who can't or won't use WebDAV, they are > > a pain for the developers since their behavior is very sensitive to > > server configurations. If you look on the bbs, you'll see that we > > get a LOT of people with problems using these. > > They are important to me, and I'm prepared to invest some time in > improving > them to work better. That's why I need to understand where they are > going. > All right, we're glad to welcome you in the dev team. I'm sure, your help will be greatfull. Would you mind to be the referent for publish*.php problems ? Thanks, Danon'. Ps: I may have a hosting to maintain 'phpicalendar.net', if Chad really doesn't want to. But it would be a shame for us that he quits. |