From: Chad L. <ch...@ch...> - 2005-11-29 23:45:29
|
I've actually considered changing the license to something free-er =20 under Creative Commons. Like free but give attribution. It hasn't =20 been an issue getting improvements back into the system. -Chad On Nov 29, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Marook Kenja wrote: > Hi, > > Ok, I just thought they where not allowed to charge for software =20 > that included it, but is allowed to charge for consultant work =20 > around it. > > As their software links to this project and even state "now =20 > includes PHP iCalendar 2.1", it seems to me they make money on open-=20= > source software be re-selling it. > I know it's onnly an add-on feature, but it's listed as a feature, =20 > not as a 'possible integration option' > > Ohh well.., > > > Jakob Peterh=E4nsel > > 'I don't have to try to be a sex bomb, I am one!' > - Kylie Minogue > > Email: ja...@hj... > AIM: Marook > Phone: +45 22684961 > > On 29/11/2005, at 23:27, Ben Francis wrote: > >> Marook Kenja wrote: >> >>> If PHP iCalendar is under GPL, shouldn't there be a free non-=20 >>> commersial >>> version of Tasks Pro as long as they use this software in it???? >> >> There is nothing in the GPL which prohibits anyone from charging for >> software, providing they release the source code of any changes they >> make. It's free as in freedom, not free as in beer. >> >> Ben >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through =20 > log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD =20 > SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |