From: Chad <ch...@ch...> - 2004-05-17 20:50:57
|
Mine says: Page generated in 0.749 seconds. For year calendar. How slow were you seeing? Mind you, I have a 30KB cap on my webserver, so slow webserving isnt the same as slow page generation. -C On May 16, 2004, at 8:53 PM, Dietrich Ayala wrote: > Looks really good! > > The only problem I noticed was that the rendering of the year calendar > was very slow. > > -dietrich > > Chad Little wrote: >> For those not up on cvs, take a look at 2.0, coming soon: >> http://www.chadsdomain.com/phpicalendar/ >> I'd like to get a test version public by June. >> -C >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband >> Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest >> 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list >> Php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband > Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest > 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |