Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] 1.1 in CVS.

[Chad L. <ch...@ch...>]

Can that be done if cvs was already tagged version-1-1?

1.0 has been out now for 2 months, and only minor issues have come up 
(and all have been fixed). I didn't see any risk in just moving to 2.0. 
I'm only working on one template at a time so the main functionality 
should work.

-C


On Jan 26, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:

>
> I'd suggest creating a branch tag for 1.1, so that minor development
> can continue to occur (e.g., what if a major security problem crops
> up?).  "cvs tag -r version-1-1 -b branch-1-1".
>
>   Bill
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
> Php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel