Re: [PHPiCalendar-DEV] What are the requirements for a 1.0 release?

[blaine <bl...@al...>]

On Thursday, Apr 3, 2003, at 12:34 America/Vancouver, Mike Traum wrote:

> FTP would work for me, it just seems odd. I believe that any hosting=20=

> site=A0that accepts file uploads would accept unlink (with the=20
> modifications I mentioned in a previous post).
>
> But, whatever. I'll make the modifications. Right now, the=20
> modifications I have on my list for the 'admin' to be release quality=20=

> are:
> - remove username & password from config & use ftp to write/delete=20
> files
> - make 5 fields for simultaneous calendar upload
> - change delete dropbox into checkboxes so multiple ones can be=20
> deleted in one step
> - remove javascript confirm
>
> That sound right? If so, I'll have that done tonight. Would you prefer=20=

> a patch off of the original, or off of the current cvs?

The current source is working beautifully on my server, after tweaking=20=

the permissions a little bit on the calendars directory. If FTP support=20=

is to be added, it should be done as an option, not to replace the=20
current system. Also, if it's not too much trouble, factoring out the=20
actual upload code should allow for FTP or WebDAV uploads.

I think that WebDAV is important, not only because Apple is moving=20
towards it, but because it supports operation over HTTPS. Anyone trying=20=

to run a secure server (e.g., someone who's disallowed 'unlink' in=20
php.ini) should *not* be using a plaintext FTP server. Since there's no=20=

real standard for sFTP (ssh, ssl-tunneled ftp, etc), WebDAV is really=20
the best protocol to standardise on, imho.

Thanks, Mike!

b.