From: Greg W. <gr...@gr...> - 2003-03-30 19:04:59
|
> Re 3 - this can be disabled in the with the config.ini.php variable,=20= > but I can remove it altogether if there's something you really dislike=20= > about the way it's implemented. The only reservation I have is the=20 > user who, later on, really want this type of functionality. I agree with the attempt to move away from Javascript, and doubt that=20 this functionality would ever be that necessary, but I guess it's not a=20= big deal if we ship with the config variable defaulting to no. > Re=A04 - It shouldn't be that much of a problem for them to be in=20 > config.inc.php. Admins who are concerned could just use=A0http basic = or=20 > digest and disable the config.inc.php username/pass. The point of the=20= > internal authentication was so be a simple & open, but not 100% secure=20= > method of authentication. If you require http basic, ftp, webdav, it's=20= > no longer general. For example, I've used a number of servers that do=20= > not have either ftp or webdav, but rely on ssh (which is encrypted). I=20= > think this is a good feature to have, and believe that as long as we=20= > highlight the caveats in the docs, people would benefit from it=20 > staying. Why would someone who relies on ssh want to use such an insecure form=20 of authentication? If you've got a server that doesn't allow any=20 webdav or ftp access, I doubt they're going to want to allow this sort=20= of thing. I guess it's possible, but is it a reasonable enough=20 scenario to cater to it? Again, it doesn't seem to be a big deal to=20 have the option, except in that the config.ini.php file just gets=20 longer and more trouble to configure (and, there's no point to having=20 features that won't be used and which take up space). That's all I got. Greg -- http://www.gregwestin.com Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php |