From: Greg W. <gr...@gr...> - 2003-03-28 20:53:13
|
I don't know of any reason why digest authentication would need to be handled differently from basic, but because everyone was using the word digest, rather than calling it something more general, I thought I'd throw that out there. Just disregard it if it doesn't apply. Greg --- http://www.gregwestin.com/ Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, blaine wrote: > On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 10:54 America/Vancouver, Greg Westin wrote: > > > If the digest option is used, it definitely needs to be an option... > > keep > > in mind that many people are still using basic authentication, for > > whatever reason. > > I'm a bit confused on this point; I hope the proposed method wasn't to > actually re-implement digest auth! ;-) As long as just the > $REMOTE_USER environment variable is used, then both digest and basic > should work fine (plus any other methods, like auth tokens, etc.). Am I > somehow mistaken, or is "digest" just being misused? > > b. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > Phpicalendar-devel mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel > |