From: Waitman C. G. <wa...@em...> - 2002-11-09 00:38:04
|
thanks bill, and i agree. it is definitely not a priority - i don't really see it in use. also, modifying my parser to handle xcal was a snap. you are correct that it is trivial. best, Waitman On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 15:43, Bill Fenner wrote: I think that: 1. xCal parsing should not be a high priority (better to improve the iCal parser), but 2. xCal parsing should be relatively trivial since xCal is a representation of the same exact data structure as iCal -- some of the stuff in ical_parser (esp, the repeat stuff) could be factored out into common code. Bill ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ Phpicalendar-devel mailing list Php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel |