|
From: Waitman C. G. <wa...@em...> - 2002-11-09 00:38:04
|
thanks bill,
and i agree. it is definitely not a priority - i don't really see it in
use.
also, modifying my parser to handle xcal was a snap. you are correct
that it is trivial.
best,
Waitman
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 15:43, Bill Fenner wrote:
I think that:
1. xCal parsing should not be a high priority (better to improve the
iCal parser), but
2. xCal parsing should be relatively trivial since xCal is a representation
of the same exact data structure as iCal -- some of the stuff in ical_parser
(esp, the repeat stuff) could be factored out into common code.
Bill
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Phpicalendar-devel mailing list
Php...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpicalendar-devel
|