From: Bill F. <fe...@re...> - 2002-10-25 01:48:03
|
Oh, this uses RECURRENCE-ID instead of EXDATE to make the change. I hadn't experienced this before since the palm datebook just uses EXDATE and creates a whole new entry. Given that phpicalendar doesn't care about the relationships between events, this could just be interpreted as a request to delete the event occurrence that happens at the time of the RECURRENCE-ID and has the same UID and create the new event. This could be implemented without worrying about the order of the events in the file by deleting the event if it's already there, or otherwise creating a placeholder "black-hole" event in the master_array that the repeat code would notice and skip. Bill |