From: Jason O. <par...@ko...> - 2010-12-06 20:51:50
|
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Jim Hu wrote: > I think there are many good suggestions here, including the core one of moving on to phpicalendar 3. My only problem with switching to Git/Mercurial and Trac is that I think it's beneficial to maintain a presence on Sourceforge. But we could at least move to subversion while staying on Sourceforge. > Git and Trac are features that can be enabled on SourceForge. Again, I don't have any practical experience with Git, but I highly recommend it (a distributed SCM) over CVS and SVN. There's a learning curve to it, but I would argue it's easier to understand and work with than either of the two former options. > I also think that despite my intention to get back to phpicalendar, the data from the past couple of years indicate that I'm not putting in the time needed for the project. > > Jim > While PHPiCalendar is a fairly popular project, it doesn't see a whole lot of regular updates. My primary motivation so far has been using it in a production environment within my workplace. It's entirely likely that once I move on, I won't be around any longer to help maintain it. So, no worries there, Jim. |