Re: [Phphtmllib-devel] Getting picky on push()

[Tim M. <mo...@mr...>]

David McNab wrote:

> At the risk of sounding pedantic, I feel the need to question the
> rightness of the name 'push' as a tag's append method.
> 
> Even though the doco explains that tags work as FIFOs, the word 'push'
> still has a stack and LIFO connotation.
> 
> How about calling it 'add' instead? Perhaps supporting 'add' and 'push'
> as synonyms, then deprecating 'push' at some stage?
> 
> Also, 'add' is one character shorter, and to some may be more
> self-explanatory than 'push'.

+1

BTW, a simple "Reply" still doesn't work.  Looking at the headers,
I see a "Return-Path" header (which I don't know what it does) but
no "Reply-To" headers.

-- 
Tim Moloney
ManTech Real-time Systems Laboratory
2015 Cattlemen Road                             \     /
Sarasota, FL  34232                     .________\(O)/________.
(941) 377-6775 x208                        '  '  O(.)O  '  '