Am using FGR to address my linking requirements. While I don't require Sources, notice they appear at bottom of browser screen. #2 is sitting on top of the date. If either were longer, it would probably run over the "Generated by…". Is the date 'fixed', or should it move based on number of Sources?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2009-11-03
Are you viewing the PDF or HTML version?
PDF is the format reports are really intended for, so that they can be printed / saved etc. On mine the date is at the bottom (footer) of every page, regardless of the number of sources or anything else. The rest flows over more pages as required, and is dependent on the paper size selected.
On the HTML version, I agree, there is overlap of data on the date information. For this version I wonder if the date is even required? Much easier to simply suppress it if HTML is chosen?
However, this may all be academic, as I believe someone is re-working a lot of the reports just now for a future (next??) release.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2009-11-03
By the way, and I'm probably going to regret asking this, what benefit do you get by using the FGR for your "linkages problem" ?
It doesn't show anything you can't see much clearer on either the Close Relatives tab, or the Family page surely?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
kiwi: I'm using browser view. Report re-write is of interest Hope whomever is doing them will consider adding INDI & FAM numbers.
//
Yes, Close Relatives does show info but am finding this suitable for this purpose, and less navigating (I am not going to FAM page if FGR is okay) between each Family. It's working as I am finding broken links that maybe root of my problem (link to me). Got one tab for work on Indi, the other tab (in browser) to generate FGR
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Am using FGR to address my linking requirements. While I don't require Sources, notice they appear at bottom of browser screen. #2 is sitting on top of the date. If either were longer, it would probably run over the "Generated by…". Is the date 'fixed', or should it move based on number of Sources?
Are you viewing the PDF or HTML version?
PDF is the format reports are really intended for, so that they can be printed / saved etc. On mine the date is at the bottom (footer) of every page, regardless of the number of sources or anything else. The rest flows over more pages as required, and is dependent on the paper size selected.
On the HTML version, I agree, there is overlap of data on the date information. For this version I wonder if the date is even required? Much easier to simply suppress it if HTML is chosen?
However, this may all be academic, as I believe someone is re-working a lot of the reports just now for a future (next??) release.
By the way, and I'm probably going to regret asking this, what benefit do you get by using the FGR for your "linkages problem" ?
It doesn't show anything you can't see much clearer on either the Close Relatives tab, or the Family page surely?
kiwi: I'm using browser view. Report re-write is of interest Hope whomever is doing them will consider adding INDI & FAM numbers.
//
Yes, Close Relatives does show info but am finding this suitable for this purpose, and less navigating (I am not going to FAM page if FGR is okay) between each Family. It's working as I am finding broken links that maybe root of my problem (link to me). Got one tab for work on Indi, the other tab (in browser) to generate FGR