Menu
▾
▴
phpesp-devel
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2009-04-18 02:14:26
|
Team,
Doug Stewart (copied on this email) is offering a USD 50 bounty for
the completion of SFID 2771740 ("Display feedback for possible
answer") within 30 calendar days.
Here is the relevant part from an email exchange we had:
"The phpESP software meets my requirements, with one missing
capability. I think that this capability would be of general use and I
would be willing to make a small contribution to its development, if
it could be done quickly.
...
I'm only looking at creating a couple of surveys. I've a designer who
can create one for me for about $50, which I can then copy and modify
as needed. I'm guessing that $50 doesn't come anywhere close to
covering the costs of making the changes. On the other hand, I think
that what I propose would be of interest to a fair number of people.
Furthermore, based on my research, it is functionality which isn't
widely available, so not only useful, but also will set phpESP apart.
So, given the choice between paying $50 for custom development that
benefits only me and making a contribution of $50 to something that
benefits many people, I would choose to go with the latter."
I'm not sure there's a protocol for how to handle bounty, but I'm
guessing it's first-come-first-served or split-between-contributors.
So, if you want it, or want to help with it, speak up!
Regards,
bishop
--
Bishop Bettini
ideacode, Inc.
(main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100
Visit us on the web at:
ideacode.com Professional software research and development
reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release
bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems
|
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2009-04-24 23:17:19
|
Anybody want this? Otherwise, I might just work on it this weekend.
Any feedback on the design for this ("feedback") and the other one I
recently regarding "credit" would be greatly appreciated before any
work begins on these.
Thanks,
bishop
Quoting Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...>:
> Team,
>
> Doug Stewart (copied on this email) is offering a USD 50 bounty for
> the completion of SFID 2771740 ("Display feedback for possible
> answer") within 30 calendar days.
>
> Here is the relevant part from an email exchange we had:
>
> "The phpESP software meets my requirements, with one missing
> capability. I think that this capability would be of general use and I
> would be willing to make a small contribution to its development, if
> it could be done quickly.
> ...
> I'm only looking at creating a couple of surveys. I've a designer who
> can create one for me for about $50, which I can then copy and modify
> as needed. I'm guessing that $50 doesn't come anywhere close to
> covering the costs of making the changes. On the other hand, I think
> that what I propose would be of interest to a fair number of people.
> Furthermore, based on my research, it is functionality which isn't
> widely available, so not only useful, but also will set phpESP apart.
> So, given the choice between paying $50 for custom development that
> benefits only me and making a contribution of $50 to something that
> benefits many people, I would choose to go with the latter."
>
>
> I'm not sure there's a protocol for how to handle bounty, but I'm
> guessing it's first-come-first-served or split-between-contributors.
> So, if you want it, or want to help with it, speak up!
--
Bishop Bettini
ideacode, Inc.
(main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100
Visit us on the web at:
ideacode.com Professional software research and development
reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release
bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems
|
|
From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2009-04-24 23:50:22
|
For me, this represents more like answers to an exam, not really
usefull for a survey. But if it provides backward compatibility: go
ahead :-)
Franky
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:17:00 -0400
Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote:
> Anybody want this? Otherwise, I might just work on it this
> weekend. Any feedback on the design for this ("feedback") and the
> other one I recently regarding "credit" would be greatly appreciated
> before any work begins on these.
>
> Thanks,
> bishop
>
> Quoting Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...>:
>
> > Team,
> >
> > Doug Stewart (copied on this email) is offering a USD 50 bounty for
> > the completion of SFID 2771740 ("Display feedback for possible
> > answer") within 30 calendar days.
> >
> > Here is the relevant part from an email exchange we had:
> >
> > "The phpESP software meets my requirements, with one missing
> > capability. I think that this capability would be of general use
> > and I would be willing to make a small contribution to its
> > development, if it could be done quickly.
> > ...
> > I'm only looking at creating a couple of surveys. I've a designer
> > who can create one for me for about $50, which I can then copy and
> > modify as needed. I'm guessing that $50 doesn't come anywhere
> > close to covering the costs of making the changes. On the other
> > hand, I think that what I propose would be of interest to a fair
> > number of people. Furthermore, based on my research, it is
> > functionality which isn't widely available, so not only useful, but
> > also will set phpESP apart. So, given the choice between paying $50
> > for custom development that benefits only me and making a
> > contribution of $50 to something that benefits many people, I would
> > choose to go with the latter."
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure there's a protocol for how to handle bounty, but I'm
> > guessing it's first-come-first-served or split-between-contributors.
> > So, if you want it, or want to help with it, speak up!
>
|
|
From: Bishop B. <ph...@id...> - 2009-04-25 00:59:55
|
Assuming that we stipulate that "there are certain security
precautions necessary for examinations that aren't present in phpESP",
is there any fundamental reason why the phpESP code base shouldn't
include "exam-like" functionality?
In other words, if the survey admin is willing to take the risk of
those missing security features, then should he be able to run an exam
for credit?
Interesting note, however, is that the request for the feedback
functionality as it will be used by the bounty staker is not for
examination, but to tell the survey taker what should be done "next".
Regards,
bishop
Quoting Franky Van Liedekerke <lie...@te...>:
> For me, this represents more like answers to an exam, not really
> usefull for a survey. But if it provides backward compatibility: go
> ahead :-)
>
> Franky
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:17:00 -0400
> Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote:
>
>> Anybody want this? Otherwise, I might just work on it this
>> weekend. Any feedback on the design for this ("feedback") and the
>> other one I recently regarding "credit" would be greatly appreciated
>> before any work begins on these.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> bishop
>>
>> Quoting Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...>:
>>
>> > Team,
>> >
>> > Doug Stewart (copied on this email) is offering a USD 50 bounty for
>> > the completion of SFID 2771740 ("Display feedback for possible
>> > answer") within 30 calendar days.
>> >
>> > Here is the relevant part from an email exchange we had:
>> >
>> > "The phpESP software meets my requirements, with one missing
>> > capability. I think that this capability would be of general use
>> > and I would be willing to make a small contribution to its
>> > development, if it could be done quickly.
>> > ...
>> > I'm only looking at creating a couple of surveys. I've a designer
>> > who can create one for me for about $50, which I can then copy and
>> > modify as needed. I'm guessing that $50 doesn't come anywhere
>> > close to covering the costs of making the changes. On the other
>> > hand, I think that what I propose would be of interest to a fair
>> > number of people. Furthermore, based on my research, it is
>> > functionality which isn't widely available, so not only useful, but
>> > also will set phpESP apart. So, given the choice between paying $50
>> > for custom development that benefits only me and making a
>> > contribution of $50 to something that benefits many people, I would
>> > choose to go with the latter."
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm not sure there's a protocol for how to handle bounty, but I'm
>> > guessing it's first-come-first-served or split-between-contributors.
>> > So, if you want it, or want to help with it, speak up!
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> phpESP-devel mailing list
> php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel
>
--
Bishop Bettini
ideacode, Inc.
(main) +1 919 341 5170 / (fax) +1 919 521 4100
Visit us on the web at:
ideacode.com Professional software research and development
reviewmysoftware.com Improve sales! Review your software before you release
bytejar.com Solutions to those annoying development problems
|
|
From: Franky V. L. <lie...@te...> - 2009-04-25 08:04:11
|
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:59:46 -0400
Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote:
> Assuming that we stipulate that "there are certain security
> precautions necessary for examinations that aren't present in
> phpESP", is there any fundamental reason why the phpESP code base
> shouldn't include "exam-like" functionality?
nope, I just wasn't "warm" for it. But again, if it doesn't change
default behaviour, no problem at all.
> In other words, if the survey admin is willing to take the risk of
> those missing security features, then should he be able to run an
> exam for credit?
sure, but I believe there are better programs for taking online exams
on freshmeat.
> Interesting note, however, is that the request for the feedback
> functionality as it will be used by the bounty staker is not for
> examination, but to tell the survey taker what should be done "next".
he probably didn't think about it yet :-)
Franky
> Regards,
> bishop
>
> Quoting Franky Van Liedekerke <lie...@te...>:
>
> > For me, this represents more like answers to an exam, not really
> > usefull for a survey. But if it provides backward compatibility: go
> > ahead :-)
> >
> > Franky
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:17:00 -0400
> > Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...> wrote:
> >
> >> Anybody want this? Otherwise, I might just work on it this
> >> weekend. Any feedback on the design for this ("feedback") and the
> >> other one I recently regarding "credit" would be greatly
> >> appreciated before any work begins on these.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> bishop
> >>
> >> Quoting Bishop Bettini <ph...@id...>:
> >>
> >> > Team,
> >> >
> >> > Doug Stewart (copied on this email) is offering a USD 50 bounty
> >> > for the completion of SFID 2771740 ("Display feedback for
> >> > possible answer") within 30 calendar days.
> >> >
> >> > Here is the relevant part from an email exchange we had:
> >> >
> >> > "The phpESP software meets my requirements, with one missing
> >> > capability. I think that this capability would be of general use
> >> > and I would be willing to make a small contribution to its
> >> > development, if it could be done quickly.
> >> > ...
> >> > I'm only looking at creating a couple of surveys. I've a designer
> >> > who can create one for me for about $50, which I can then copy
> >> > and modify as needed. I'm guessing that $50 doesn't come
> >> > anywhere close to covering the costs of making the changes. On
> >> > the other hand, I think that what I propose would be of interest
> >> > to a fair number of people. Furthermore, based on my research,
> >> > it is functionality which isn't widely available, so not only
> >> > useful, but also will set phpESP apart. So, given the choice
> >> > between paying $50 for custom development that benefits only me
> >> > and making a contribution of $50 to something that benefits many
> >> > people, I would choose to go with the latter."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure there's a protocol for how to handle bounty, but I'm
> >> > guessing it's first-come-first-served or
> >> > split-between-contributors. So, if you want it, or want to help
> >> > with it, speak up!
> >>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> > Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> > royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally
> > facing server and web deployment.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> > _______________________________________________
> > phpESP-devel mailing list
> > php...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel
> >
>
>
>
|
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X