From: Charlie S. <Sm...@ld...> - 2004-02-10 16:16:44
|
I got the impression that you wanted to change fields of NOT NULL DEFAULT '', to: NOT NULL But what I'm suggesting is changing them to allow nulls. So, you'd just get rid of the NOT NULL DEFAULT '' line altogether and replace with nothing. Is that ok? >>> "Matthew Gregg" <gr...@mu...> 2/9/2004 6:17:48 PM >>> Yup, you are correct, see my earlier message in this thread that talks about mysql 3/4 behavior and this very thing. On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 10:07, Charlie Smith wrote: > I believe chagning these fields to nullable would be better. That way the > default value may be null, as designed in the first place. Then perhaps, > minimum amount of code need be changed.\ > ...snip... -- mcg ------------------------------------- The IT Lab (http://www.itlab.musc.edu) ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ phpESP-devel mailing list php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel |