From: Stefan C. <sch...@ea...> - 2003-10-03 18:06:54
|
Sorry to bring this back on the table, but I don't rememebr why we ended up deciding for PEAR support. Why not use ODBC instead ? After all, it's a DB abstraction too... I ask because I feel I'll need transaction support and that is not clearly documented in PEAR (but is in ODBC). Just to make for fun, today I'm adding a feature to be able to include a picture with a question. stF |