From: James E. F. <jf...@uv...> - 2003-10-02 00:49:31
|
Stefan Champailler wrote: > Every here and there, there is a possibility to pick a survey (fro reporting, > testing, etc.) > > I think that the list provided gives too much information. A "dumb" enduser > doesn't care about a survey ID. Similarly, I don't see the point to give the > group/owner name, if someone has no right to see someone else's work, that > is, he'll just see his stuff. > > So, I propose to simplify and abstract the "pick a survey" screens. I'll > retain the original layout if the user is a "superuser". In that case, it is > normal to provide as much information as possible. (I think) Survey ID's were initially there because survey names were not. Clearly id's should be used internally and behind the scenes as much as possible for efficiency, but they should be hidden from all users completely. The superuser group should (optionally?) see Ids. Similarly, places like the cross-tabulation should avoid using internal question IDs etc., tho logical question number are fine (I think this is already free of exposed IDs?). -James |