From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-01-10 15:47:37
|
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Danie Roux wrote: > Is CVS more stable than RC2? Should I use CVS rather > than RC2? The code in the CVS tree is the most recent code. At times this may be very unstable. At the moment the code in CVS is stable, and is preferred to 1.3 RC2 because of a few bugs that I have fixed. The main reason CVS is stable now is that I am preparing to release 1.3, so I am only committing bug fixes, not new code. However, my first consideration when I say "stable" is data integrity; in other words data collected from surveys is correct and will not be corrupted. In this respect 1.3 RC2 is just as stable as the code in CVS, however when viewing the results (in phpESP) the CVS code works better because of bug fixes. So to sum this up. If you are running 1.3 RC2 you are fine, you will be able to easily upgrade to 1.3 (final) when I release it and you do not have to worry about any data loss. While using 1.3 RC2 you *do* have to worry if you rely only on phpESP for data analysis. I would suggest that if you have the ability, you should use CVS. CVS is a wonderful tool, and will make upgrading and fixing bugs much easier. For example, if you have 1.3 RC2 from the CVS tree, and I release 1.3 (final) all you have to do to upgrade is type: cvs up -Pd -rREL_1_3 For more information on CVS check out: http://www.cvshome.org/ http://www.gnu.org/manual/cvs/ Take it easy, -James |